The times are changing, the feet of robots are changing.

Illustrator Shimizu Yoichi is often thinking: Humans don’t pay for high-quality things, but pay for things that look “expensive,” so it’s important to make yourself “looking expensive.” Of course, quality and painting are also important, but people with quality are not willing to pay high prices for you. And with both quality and high-level, it can become a luxury brand

(https://twitter.com/you629/status/1187277766560899072).

Mechanical designer Nakagawa Haruka said that the robot feet in the previous works were relatively large because people thought that in order to support the weight of the robot itself, the feet must become bigger. This interpretation is real

Nowadays, the animation uses 3DCG to let the robot walk on the uneven ground. It is found that too much foot will interfere with the ground and cannot guarantee sufficient grounding space, so the foot tends to become smaller

Design is not only in line with the current environment, but also has a realistic image, and it is also a fashion trend that will surely be outdated one day. Therefore, North China does not want to easily comment on the past design style “rusty”. Because this sentence will be like a boomerang, hitting the future of yourself

(https://twitter.com/bing_chang/status/1185110929475637248).

Adult cartoonistえびふらいSeeing someone spits someone else’s work is wrong, saying: In today’s online society, the information you want (pictures) can be found, so now What is needed is to be able to find out whether the information that you have obtained is the “eye” of what you are really looking for

Jin Jinyi, who is a military supervisor for many animations, also said that with the Internet, as long as a keyword is searched, a picture of most weapons can be found. But is this picture real, or is it a simulation gun or a model gun? If it is the latter, what is the difference with real goods? Or will it be a real thing, but it is a training or a prototype, not the same as a practical weapon? Judging these is the key to the supervision work

(https://twitter.com/Kenichi_Kaneko/status/1187555653344100352).

Editor Zhu Junjun helped put forward a hypothesis: attractive articles may have three major elements of “weight”, “logic” and “feeling”. The article should have the weight from the author’s personal experience, understand the logic, and at the same time impress the reader’s emotions. What needs to be written is an article that combines the three

(https://twitter.com/tshun423/status/1186845172149022721).

The original author of the comics Aoki Kenzo said that no matter whether it is an editor or a writer, when expressing the same content, some people will say “this is better”, and some people will say “you can’t do it.” He believes that you don’t have to reluctantly deal with people who use negative expressions such as “no” or “hard”. These people can only say such words, they have proved that their ability is limited, can not give positive advice

Various suggestions including the creation theory, if you use the threat of “not ○○○” and “must ○○”, please ignore it. Even if Aoki himself smugly said this, please do not see it. It is enough to use the convenience trick of “this way to make more money / easier”

For those who only use the tone of criticism and accusation, those who say bad things when they are not moving are not like those who have experience to testify, who can easily draw conclusions without clear basis, and who see people who serve dishes, whether Writers or editors, it is best to open the distance early. The world is big, there are others

(https://twitter.com/p_kobushi)